Which of these is NOT considered a method for attributing cyber attacks?

Assessing geographic diversity is not typically considered a method for attributing cyber attacks. Cyber attack attribution often relies on more direct indicators that link a specific attack to an actor or group.

Using an IP address can provide information about where an attack originates, allowing analysts to track down the source or associated infrastructure. Analyzing tactics and procedures helps identify patterns consistent with known threat actors, enhancing the understanding of who may be behind an attack. Evaluating political goals involves assessing the motives behind an attack, as many cyber attacks are carried out to achieve specific objectives related to political or strategic interests.

In contrast, assessing geographic diversity focuses on the variety of locations from which attacks may be launched or the global nature of cyber threat actors, rather than establishing direct links to specific attackers. Thus, it doesn't serve as a reliable method for attribution.